What I love most
about Chris Tovani’s I Read It, But I Don't Get It is how personal and
professional her writing is. She introduces herself by explaining how in high
school, she was a struggling reader and goes on to describe her own reading
history of fake reading for classes. She the reading struggles of her past to
connect and relate to the struggling readers in her classroom. The reality of
fake reading is something I think most college students have experienced at one
time or another. Most good students have figured out how to play the education
system by simply jumping through the required academic hoops, in order to
receive the grade they want. This is the reality for most students. I love that
Tovani purposefully structures her expectations of students around this
well known fact. She doesn’t do book reports, because she knows how easy they
are to fake. She doesn’t waste time creating “cute” projects that work with Bloom’s Taxonomy, because she knows that
thought-provoking questions don’t always equate to high-level,
thought-provoking answers. She is real and honest about what works and how to
make reading instruction meaningful for students.
The expectation
amongst high school educators that their students should already know how to
read by the time they reach their classroom is common. Even I have heard
teachers complaining about this. I love how Tovani addresses this directly by
stating that reading instruction must continue in secondary schools, because it
is perhaps the time when students need it the most. At the primary level,
students are taught basic level comprehension skills such as decoding and
reading with fluency. Yet, secondary teachers continue to expect their students
to walk into their classroom at the start of each school year as sophisticated
readers who are ready to tackle dramatically increased reading requirements. Tovani
explains to her readers that a master’s degree isn’t necessary for improving
student reading comprehension, instead she offers the following simple
suggestions: “become a passionate reader of what you teach,” and “model how
good readers read” (21).
I usually like
when authors of pedagogy books provide concrete activities and lesson ideas,
because it helps me visualize how I would implement the theories into a
classroom, which is why I particularly enjoy reading Kelly Gallagher—but Tovani
provides very few detailed descriptions of what her theories actually look like
in the classroom. However, I still really enjoyed reading this book and it has
provided me with a more comprehensive understanding of how to teach reading to
my future students.
No comments:
Post a Comment